Should Our Schools Amalgamate?
This was the question I, and about 30 other parents and interested parties, found ourselves discussing this morning in the lower school hall.
Currently our children go to two schools, an infant and a junior one that effectively share a site. The infant school is run on the lower floor of the 1930′s brick building, the junior school is situated upstairs. We are lucky in that the schools have enough grounds that each school has their own, separate concrete playground and a good-sized school field. The schools have separate heads, and teaching and admin staff; the only thing they really share is the welfare room and a uniform.
This means that in the September that the children enter Year 3, they leave the staff and building they have known for the last 3 years and move up to the junior school. They are gently acclimatised beforehand and introduced to their teachers and shown around what will be their new school while they are in Year 2. I’ve had two children go through the change of schools now with very little trouble. DD3 will go up to the Junior school next year and I’m expecting her to take it in her stride as well. But I can see how it would be easier on the children if there were just one school, with the same staff and way of doing things throughout their primary school life.
I’ve had a child at the school for the last 7 years and this is how it’s always been. But a couple of months ago, we got a newsletter saying that the junior school Head intended to retire come the end of this school year and we’d be informed later what this meant for the school. You can imagine the playground conversations, I’m sure.
Would the junior school Deputy take over the Head’s position? Would we get a new junior school Head? Or would the first school Head take over the whole school?
As time went by, and new pieces of paper made their way home, it became apparent that the later scenario is the policy of our local council. They would prefer both schools to amalgamate with the existing first school Head taking over as Head of them both. But first, parents and other interested parties ( teachers and other staff) have to be consulted. So that’s what I was doing this morning; listening to the council and Board of Governors talk about, and answer any questions about what amalgamation would mean for our schools.
I went along thinking amalgamation was a good thing, as I know and like the first school Head and think they would do a good job as Head of an amalgamated primary school. But I knew there would be a significant funding cut if we amalgamated and was curious to see if we could find out exactly how big this cut would be compared to the whole school budget. And I wanted to see what the general mood towards merging the schools was and hear what other questions people had.
It was an interesting experience. People’s main concerns revolve around the cut funding going from two schools to one, whether their children’s education would be affected, the possibility of job losses and whether a Head teacher responsible for just over 600 children would be ‘spread too thin’. All questions were taken on board and discussed if appropriate and I came away feeling more knowledgeable about what a merger might entail than I did when I went in.
I feel reasonably happy about what is being proposed, but it was obvious that not everyone at the meeting felt same way so we will have to wait until May to find out what will happen to our schools.
It’s going to be along 4 months as if we don’t amalgamate we will be getting a new junior school head, which will affect two of my children next year anyway.
In the meantime, is there anyone out there whose children go to a recently amalgamated school? Do you have any words of wisdom for us?

















Not ours as it’s still infant and junior (which I think is prob necessary for a 3-form entry school), but there is a nearby school that was amalgamated a few years ago and was ‘satisfactory’ then and now it’s ‘outstanding’ as the new head has apparantly worked wonders. My thinking about it is if it aint broke, don’t fix it! Our school is effectively two separate buildings, with the school kitchens as a corridor inbetween and a canteen at either end so to make it into one would be hard as it was purpose built as two schools. The infant head is retiring this year, but I should imagine they will recruit from outside as the deputy is fairly new too.
Your council obviously doesn’t have an amalgamation policy then. Our school is 3 form entry too, with a 4 form entry for reception this year!
Our infant/junior amalgamated the year before DS started (he’s now in year 2). It does make it a *massive* school. It went 4 form entry last year. I think it’s still settling down, even after this time. We’ve also had building work on site which doesn’t help.
I don’t think we need any building work but we do have a few ‘cabins’. We have interesting times ahead no matter what!
Sounds very similar to us, in the end I suspect there is no real choice but to merge *school cutbacks* good luck and I hope it all goes well.
Yeah, I have to admit that part of me wonders if we really do have any choice in this…
The school my children went to recently merged. They are on a split-site.
One of the key reasons, which I think is very significant, is that as there are fewer and fewer infant and junior schools around, it actually becomes much harder to recruit to them – especially in leadership positions. People do not want to commit to leading a “junior” or especially an “infant” school and then find they are discounting for through-school positions later.
We have noticed only good things in terms of the merger. although many were apprehensive.
The recruitment issue has been mentioned to us as well. That it has been positive for you is reassuring.